Trial reportStroke2026
Partnering With an Urban Hospital for Stroke Preparedness in the Emergency Department: SPEDI Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe tested the Stroke Preparedness in the Emergency Department Intervention, an emergency department-based intervention that teaches stroke symptoms and the importance of calling 911, in a racially diverse community.
methodsThis was a National Institutes of Health-funded, single-center, participant-blinded parallel-group trial of adult emergency department patients randomized 1:1 to a brief pamphlet and video stroke preparedness intervention versus a general cardiovascular health control condition (Life's Simple 7; from February 2022 to August 2023). The primary outcome was intent to call 911 in response to 4 video vignettes (Video STAT instrument) depicting an actor having an acute stroke (stroke action score, range 0-8) at 1 month (delayed posttest). Secondary outcomes were recognition of the 4 videos depicting an acute stroke (stroke recognition score; range, 0-4) and the stroke action score immediately after treatment. Linear mixed models evaluated the association between intervention groups and each outcome, with adjustment for baseline characteristics, in a prespecified per-protocol analysis.
resultsOf the 353 participants randomized, 330 participants were included (159 in the intervention group, 171 in the control group, 61% female, 49% Black adults). The intervention group had a higher intent to call 911 than the control group on the immediate posttest (adjusted mean stroke action score difference, 1.14 points higher [95% CI, 0.78-1.50];
conclusionsAmong an adult emergency department population, a brief intervention increased intent to call 911 for stroke and increased recognition of stroke symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.