ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of alternative pomalidomide dosing regimens in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Pharmacokinetic Variability of Pomalidomide: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Disease-Related Physiology, Ethnicity, Hepatic Impairment, Food Effects, Drug Interactions, and Smoking.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Rational use of expensive medicines in the Netherlands: strategies to improve effectiveness and reduce burden on patients and society - a narrative review.BMC medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard pomalidomide dosing (4 mg/day for 21 of 28 days) achieved the most robust pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects. Daily dosing with pomalidomide 2 mg is a safe alternative for patients at risk of toxicity; alternate-day dosing was less effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.