ReviewJournal of audiology & otology2025
Psychometric Properties of Misophonia Measurement Questionnaires: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of audiology & otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential brain responses to affective sounds in misophonia and hyperacusis: A task-based fMRI approach.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMisophonia is a sound sensitivity disorder characterized by intense emotional and physiological responses to specific triggers. These responses are often associated with heightened reactions from the autonomic nervous system. In this study, we investigated the psychometric properties of the misophonia measurement questionnaires. MATERIALS AND
methodsA bibliographic search without publication date or language restrictions was conducted in March 2023 and updated in October 2024. The search had no time limit for the retrieval of relevant studies, including cross-sectional and psychometric studies. Two authors screened the titles and abstracts, and irrelevant studies were excluded after reviewing the full text of the articles. Any disagreements during the selection process were resolved through discussion. Standardized critical appraisal tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) tool were used to assess the psychometric properties of the instruments.
resultsOf the 130 screened articles, 34 were selected for full-text evaluation, and 25 articles met the inclusion criteria.
conclusionEvidence regarding the psychometric properties of the measures of misophonia is limited, indicating the need for further research to explore these instruments across various cultures and languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.