Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41178474›Full record

ReviewJournal of audiology & otology2025

Practical Guidelines for Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid Application and Personal Sound Amplification Device Usage to Correct Hearing Loss in Korea Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial by the Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center.

Myeongsin Kang, Jae-Hyun Seo, Jae-Jun Song, Il Joon Moon, Yong-Ho Park, Moo Kyun Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of audiology & otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Myeongsin KangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Hyun SeoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Jun SongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Il Joon MoonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong-Ho ParkDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Moo Kyun ParkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HC19C0128Ministry of Health and Welfare HI19C0481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of mild-to-moderate hearing loss is increasing due to noise exposure and an expanding elderly population. Despite the benefits of hearing aids, many individuals avoid them due to cost and incomplete awareness, opting instead for smartphone-based hearing aid applications (SHAAs) and personal sound amplification products (PSAPs). However, these devices are currently lacking official approval for medical use. The study results, together with roundtable discussions organized by the Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center (PACEN) and recent research findings, were reviewed to develop clinical guidelines. The roundtable discussions involved seven otology experts and one lay representative and focused on defining PSAPs and establishing minimum requirements for their use by patients with hearing loss. Hearing aids were found to effectively address all types of hearing loss and improve speech recognition in noisy environments. In contrast, SHAA and PSAP are effective only under specific conditions: SHAA for mild loss and PSAP for mild-to-moderate loss. Both devices perform poorly in noisy settings and lack noise processing features. Hearing aids are recommended as the most effective and versatile option for auditory rehabilitation, whereas SHAA and PSAP should only be considered under defined conditions when hearing aids are impractical. Continued updates and cost-effectiveness evaluations will be required as technologies advance.

Indexed as

GuidelinesHearing aidsHearing lossPersonal sound amplification productsSmartphone-based hearing aid applications

Identifiers

PMID41178474
PMCPMC12580935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.