ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
3D Swin Transformer for patient-specific proton dose prediction of brain cancer patients.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAccurate dose plans in proton radiotherapy with consistent target in complex anatomical regions such as the brain are crucial. This study investigates a Swin Transformer-based deep learning model for voxel-wise dose prediction in brain cancer proton therapy, evaluating its spatial and dosimetric fidelity against clinically delivered plans. Patient/material and methods: A cohort of 206 patients with primary brain tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Dual-energy computed tomography (CT) scans, clinical contours, and corresponding proton dose plans were used to train and test a 3D Swin Transformer integrated within a UNet architecture. The model was evaluated on an independent test set (n = 20) using 3D gamma analysis (3%/3 mm), mean absolute error (MAE), and clinical target volume (CTV) coverage (V95%). Mean dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were compared across CTV.
resultsThe model achieved a median gamma pass rate of 99.8% within the CTV (range: 78.6-100%), 83.2% outside the CTV (range: 52.3-99.8%), and a whole-volume median pass rate of 90.0% (range: 53.7-99.8%). The median MAE was 0.72 Gy (range: 0.2816-1.8966 Gy). Predicted dose distributions preserved high-dose conformity, with a median of V95% of 97.9% (range: 78.8-100%). DVH curves closely matched the clinical reference plans across all evaluated structures.
interpretationThe proposed Swin Transformer-based model is a step toward accurate, anatomy-aware dose prediction for brain tumor proton therapy. Future work will address prospective validation and optimization for clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.