Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41178017›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026

Simulation-Based Training in Dental Radiography: The Impact of Qbion Software on Learning Outcomes for Dentistry Students.

Marta Krzyżanowska, Dominika Łabno, Kamila Smala, Weronika Miazek, Magdalena Piskórz, Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simulation-Based Training in Dental Radiography: The Impact of Qbion Software on Learning Outcomes for Dentistry Students.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marta KrzyżanowskaStudent Research Group at the Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2932-0337
Dominika ŁabnoStudent Research Group at the Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Kamila SmalaStudent Research Group at the Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Weronika MiazekStudent Research Group at the Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Magdalena PiskórzDepartment of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Ingrid Różyło-KalinowskaDepartment of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnhancing the quality of radiographic imaging is crucial for minimising patient exposure to ionising radiation resulting from repeated X-rays. Addressing technical errors during patient positioning is vital for obtaining accurate extraoral radiographs. Radiological simulation offers dentistry students a unique opportunity to refine their skills and gain experience in taking intraoral and extraoral X-rays without ionising radiation. MATERIALS AND

methodsA survey was conducted among 98 dental students. Half of them comprised the control group which had taken a course in radiography, and the other 50% were the study group who additionally underwent Qbion training. Respondents answered 13 single- and multiple-choice questions concerning one correct and 12 panoramic radiographs with one, two or three positioning errors. The students were asked to identify the reason for the occurrence of a technical error. The results were analysed descriptively.

resultsA correctly taken panoramic X-ray was recognised by 79 students (80.6%). Among them, 44 students (55.7%) used the Qbion software. The most commonly identified error was asymmetrical patient positioning, identified by 78 of 98 respondents (79.6%)-43 (55.1%) in the study group and 35 (44.9%) in the control group. The most difficult question concerning the too forward position of the patient was correctly answered only by 34 students. DISCUSSION: Students utilising Qbion software demonstrated a higher accuracy in answering questions related to radiographic errors, indicating the software's effectiveness in enhancing practical skills. The analysis of multiple-choice questions showed that the higher the degree of difficulty, the lower the percentage of correct answers.

conclusionsThe results suggest that integrating radiological simulation tools, like Qbion, significantly improves learning outcomes for students. However, further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Education, DentalRadiography, DentalSimulation TrainingSoftwareStudents, DentalClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementHumansRadiography, PanoramicSurveys and Questionnairesdental radiologypanoramic X‐rayQbionsimulation

Identifiers

PMID41178017
PMCPMC13383321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.