ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Implications of uniparental disomy in forensic kinship testing: A case study of paternal isodisomy on chromosome 3.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In typical inheritance, a child receives one chromosome of each pair from each parent. In rare cases, however, both chromosomes may be inherited from the same parent, a phenomenon known as uniparental disomy (UPD). In forensic kinship testing, UPD can lead to Mendelian inconsistencies between parent and child, increasing the risk of inconclusive or erroneous interpretations. In this case study, inconsistencies between the mother and child during paternity testing prompted further investigation. Parentage was confirmed (probability of maternity and paternity >99.99%), using autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) typing. Additional analyses were performed, including STR sequencing via next-generation sequencing (NGS) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray testing across all trio samples. A total of 4 STRs and 273 SNPs on Chromosome 3 were examined, confirming complete paternal isodisomy in the child. Alternative kinship scenarios were then evaluated to assess the impact of UPD on relationship testing. While paternity results remained conclusive, maternal and secondary relationship analyses produced inconclusive and false outcomes, even when up to 42 STR loci were included. This study highlights the importance of recognizing UPD and its genotypic features in forensic casework. To mitigate the risk of misinterpretation, forensic scientists should remain vigilant for multiple inconsistencies restricted to a single chromosome, supported by the implementation of software alerts designed to flag such patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.