Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41177940›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Temporal displacement of the mammal community in a protected area due to hunting and recreational activities.

Anne Peters, Adam F Smith, Maik Henrich, Carsten F Dormann, Marco Heurich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Baseline Activity Patterns of Two Captive Red Pandas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Temporal displacement of the mammal community in a protected area due to hunting and recreational activities.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne PetersDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-7095
Adam F SmithDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Maik HenrichDepartment of National Park Monitoring and Animal Management, Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany.
Carsten F DormannDepartment of Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-1794
Marco HeurichDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und VerbraucherschutzDeutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recreation (i.e., hiking and biking) and hunting can occur simultaneously in time and space, and both sources of disturbance affect wildlife behavior, leading to reactions resembling anti-predator behavior. However, the additive effects of lethal and non-lethal human disturbances on wildlife are only beginning to be understood, and research on the impact of hunting on non-target species is limited. Recreation and hunting commonly co-occur in areas where wildlife is present, and understanding their combined effects on wildlife behavior is crucial for protected area management. Using records from 122 camera traps placed along trails and in surrounding forests, we assessed the effect of varying intensities of hunting and recreation over space and time on the temporal activity of red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), wild boar (Sus scrofa), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), and Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany. We documented the relative abundance of these species on trails versus in forests and applied Bayesian models to assess how hunting and recreation influenced wildlife nocturnality. Our results suggest that hunting is a strong driver behind wildlife temporal behavior. Hunting amplified avoidance of non-lethal recreation and potentially impacts species interactions. Red deer exhibited the most pronounced temporal avoidance of both hunting and recreational activity, increasing nocturnality and trail avoidance as these disturbances increased. Red deer were more diurnal in the non-hunting zone and decreased nocturnal activity with increasing distance from the hunting zone. Wild boar and non-hunted species exhibited moderate or negligible responses. However, high hunting effort led to species not targeted by hunting (roe deer and red fox) increasing their temporal avoidance of recreational activities, with wild boar and roe deer avoiding trails more strongly. In the context of protected area management, our results suggest that strictly reducing hunting in space and time while concentrating recreation in certain areas to create disturbance-free habitat year-round has great potential to reduce the temporal avoidance of humans by wildlife, thereby fostering nature conservation goals by protecting natural processes.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFoxesHuntingLynxMammalsRecreationSus scrofaAnimalsDeerGermanyParks, RecreationalTime Factorsactivity patterncamera trapconservationhuntingnocturnalityprotected arearecreationtourismwildlife management

Identifiers

PMID41177940
PMCPMC12580470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.