GuidelineMilitary Medical Research2025
Chinese expert consensus on prevention, diagnosis, and management of venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients (2024).
Guideline in Military Medical Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) management in adult burn patients has become a crucial focus in China. The intricate nature of VTE necessitates specialized anticoagulation strategies due to the unique challenges posed by burn injuries. To address this pressing issue, the Burn and Trauma Branch of the Chinese Geriatric Medical Association and Critical Care Group of Burn Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association organized a panel of domestic experts in burn surgery, critical care medicine, vascular surgery, nursing, and health statistics and methodology from Chinese hospitals to discuss VTE-related issues in burn injury, the heightened risk factors such as extensive tissue damage and prolonged immobilization, and the delicate balance required in anticoagulation therapy to mitigate bleeding risks. Based on the latest available research evidence as well as the clinical experience of the panel experts, this consensus comprehensively evaluates factors such as generalizability, suitability, and the potential implications for resource allocation. It also appropriately weighs the clinical advantages against possible drawbacks, resulting in the formulation of 21 guideline recommendations.Registration Practice Guideline REgistry for transPAREncy (PREPARE): No. 2023CN656.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.