ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
Predicting the optimal timing for triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation: mature oocytes retrieval predictor.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has revolutionized infertility treatment; however, its success largely depends on effective controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and the timing of oocyte retrieval. This study aimed to develop a regression equation model to optimize the timing of ovulation trigger in COS..
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 503 COS cycles (380 with follitropin alfa, 123 with follitropin delta) as training data. We modified the Follicle-To-Oocyte Index (FOI) and developed the Follicle-To-mature Oocyte Index (FmOI), which indicates how many mature oocytes (MII) were obtained for each antral follicle count. This index was used as an indicator for the retrieval of mature oocytes. When using FmOI as the objective variable, we selected relevant factors through Lasso regression analysis. Based on the obtained regression equations, the accuracy was compared and verified by predicting the number of MII in the test data.
resultsLasso regression analysis resulted in the creation of an FmOI prediction model using Initial serum FSH, number of follicles ≥ 14 mm, and total gonadotropin dose as explanatory variables. The regression equation model achieved Median Absolute Error values of 1.90 and 1.80 MII counts in the test data for the Alfa and Delta groups, respectively. Concordance index for MII prediction were 0.98 for follitropin alfa and 0.87 for follitropin delta. Use of the model showed higher CLBR in Alfa and non-inferiority in Delta than control group.
conclusionThis model reliably predicts the number of MII and optimizes trigger timing in COS. By considering key predictors, it provides a precise tool to enhance clinical outcomes in assistedreproductive technology .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.