Trial reportAIDS and behavior2026
AEGIDA: Results of a Pilot Randomized Trial of an HIV Self-Testing Intervention for Women Who Exchange Sex and Use Substances in Kazakhstan.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06150937 (HIV Self-testing Intervention for Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HIV Self-testing Intervention for Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV self-testing (HST) is a user-controlled approach to increasing HIV testing and status knowledge, the gateway to biomedical prevention and treatment. HST is a promising option for key populations facing stigma-related barriers to testing in primary and specialty (e.g., HIV, substance use) healthcare clinics. We conducted a pilot efficacy trial of AEGIDA, a 4-session intervention designed for women who exchange sex and use substances, in Kazakhstan, where there is a growing HIV epidemic. Between November 2022 and August 2023, we used community-engaged approaches to recruit and screen 305 HIV-negative cisgender and transgender women (47% eligible). Ninety participants were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 assignment to the active (AEGIDA) or a time-attention control (didactic self-screening information) condition with 6 months of follow-up. AEGIDA's theoretically grounded sessions included evidence-based techniques to reduce internalized intersectional stigma and build HST skills to increase HIV testing (e.g., motivational interviewing, peer education, and cognitive restructuring). Sessions were delivered face-to-face and via videoconference, with a closed Instagram page for active condition participants to access content on demand. The intent-to-treat analysis found that participants randomized to AEGIDA were over 4 times more likely to complete a recent HIV test (1 + test in the prior three months; aOR = 4.08, 95% CI: 1.22,13.62) at 6-month follow-up compared to control participants. The intervention had no significant impact on consistent HIV testing (1 + test per three months over the six-month follow-up period; aOR = 2.02, 95%CI: 0.69-5.88). Overall, the AEGIDA intervention demonstrated feasibility and acceptability, and preliminary efficacy to increase recent HIV testing. NCT Information NCT06150937.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41177842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.