Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41177826›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology2025

Artificial intelligence in hematology: current trends and application areas.

Ebru Kilic Gunes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Hematology-Oncology Fellows' Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Multicenter Educational Practice and Needs Assessment Survey.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ebru Kilic GunesUniversity of Health Sciences, Gülhane Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. ebrukilic83@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-3172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to map the current research trends, application areas, and thematic clusters of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in hematology. A literature search was conducted in the Web of Science on June 1, 2025, covering the years 1980-2025. A total of 376 original research articles were analyzed using bibliometric techniques, including trend keyword and factor analyses, via the bibliometrix package in R Studio. The USA (n = 111), China (79), the United Kingdom (22), and Germany (21) were the most productive countries, with Harvard University as the leading institution. Keywords revealed research concentration in thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, risk assessment, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, atrial fibrillation, anticoagulants, morphological analysis, blood management, sepsis, and acute myeloid leukemia. Recent years have shown rising interest in transcriptome, prediction modeling, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, blood management, thrombosis, venous thromboembolism cancer and COVID-19 related complications. Factor analysis grouped the literature into five clusters: AI and core hematologic diseases, clinical quality improvement, risk prediction using health data, intensive care, and cardiovascular applications. AI demonstrates substantial contributions to diagnostic accuracy, prognostication, and personalized care in hematology. The findings highlight AI's growing potential in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes through data-driven and genomics-based innovations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHematologic DiseasesHematologyCOVID-19Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansSARS-CoV-2Artificial intelligenceBibliometric analysisDeep learningHematologyMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41177826
PMCPMC12672734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.