ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Early postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: is an update of the ISGPS definition required?
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reducing Complications in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a severe complication in pancreatic surgery. This study focused on early PPH (E-PPH), aiming to identify its characteristics, evaluate the existing grading criteria by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), and explore effective treatment strategies.
methodsPatients undergoing pancreatic surgery between March 2020 and January 2024 in two institutions were screened from prospectively maintained databases. Patients with E-PPH were divided into intervention group and the conservative group. The sites of hemorrhage were determined and categorized. Clinical presentation and outcomes were compared among different grades and interventions.
resultsAmong 4062 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery, 113 cases of E-PPH were identified, with an incidence of 2.8%. E-PPH was more concentrated within 24 h (76.2%) and occurred more extraluminally (78.2%). The intervention group had a higher proportion of hemodynamic instability (40.9%) and ICU stays (54.5%). E-PPH in the mesenteric region was more common in pancreaticoduodenectomy (81.9%) and open surgery (90.9%). Branches of the common hepatic artery and superior mesenteric vessel were the majority responsible vessels. Appropriate E-PPH treatment was effective, with successful hemostasis in all intervention cases. The occurrence of ICU admission, the length of ICU and postoperative hospital stay and 90-day mortality were not significantly different between different grades with intervention.
conclusionAppropriate therapy for E-PPH could lead to a favorable prognosis. The current definitions and grades for PPH are inadequate and require further modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.