ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026
Occurrence and evolution of cannibal behaviour in extant snakes.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extant snakes (Serpentes) are a highly diverse group of squamate reptiles, which have independently evolved key morphological adaptations to consume a large variety of vertebrate and invertebrate prey. While these predator-prey interactions have been widely addressed by several studies, little is known regarding the occurrence of cannibal behaviour in snakes, with scattered reports restricted mostly to natural history notes or incidental records. Here we provide an extensive review of cannibalism in extant snakes, with 503 case events available from the literature, that encompass at least 207 species in 15 families, in both captivity and the wild. For all case events, including those with and without location data, cannibal incidents occurred mostly within the Colubridae (29.0%), Viperidae (21.2%), and Elapidae (18.9%). As cannibalism in snakes has been hypothesized to be a random event, we test whether theories of foraging and feeding strategies apply to cannibal behaviour, finding that prey and predator body size are positively correlated (R = 0.81). Furthermore, we explore the evolution of cannibal behaviour in extant snakes, inferring a maximum-likelihood ancestral character estimation of cannibalism over a family-level phylogenetic tree, which revealed independent evolution of this behaviour at least 11 times during the evolutionary history of snakes. Cannibalism also appears to be correlated with macrostomate mandibular morphotypes, occurring only in Alethinophidia, and being absent in most snakes that possess mandibular morphotypes with reduced mobility. We conclude that cannibal behaviour appears to be widespread in extant snakes, and possibly represents an opportunistic behaviour that can be related to their evolutionary history, dietary and morphological specialization, environment, and other ecological correlates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.