ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Role of additional topotecan injections (plus two) in reducing recurrence rate in retinoblastoma of group D and group E patients: a retrospective study.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of administering additional intravitreal topotecan injections (plus two) in reducing the recurrence rate in patients with advanced retinoblastoma (RB). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This retrospective, non-comparative and interventional study encompassed 26 eyes of 25 patients with RB, treated between January 2019 and April 2024. All eyes in this series had received previous intravenous chemotherapy and/or intra-arterial chemotherapy. Patients received intravitreal topotecan (30 µg/0.1 mL) and/or intravitreal melphalan (20-30 µg/0.1 mL) injections every 3-4 weeks until vitreous seeds regression was achieved. Subsequently, two additional injections of topotecan (30 µg/0.1 mL) were administered after complete regression to consolidate subclinical residuals. The control of vitreous seeds, ocular toxicity assessment and clinical characteristics was observed.
resultsThe median age of the patients was 26 months, with 57.7% belonging to group D and 42.3% to group E of RB classification. A total of 111 injections were administered in 26 eyes, with a median of 4 injections per eye. Complete vitreous seeds regression was achieved in 100% of eyes, and eye salvage was successful in 24 of 26 eyes (92.3%). There were no recurrences of vitreous seeds. Enucleation was performed in two eyes: one due to phthisis bulbi and one due to optic nerve tumour recurrence. No cases of systemic metastasis or death were reported.
conclusionAdministering additional intravitreal topotecan injections (plus two) following the complete regression of vitreous seeds may contribute to reducing the recurrence rate in patients with RB. This approach enhances the long-term efficacy of intravitreal injections, thereby contributing to higher eye salvage rates.However, the retrospective, non-randomised design and small sample size remain limitations. Multicentre prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.