ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Tracking real-world persistence and adherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy with prefilled syringes: a German prescription sales analysis.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Trials to Treatment: Current Evidence Supporting Faricimab Use in nAMD and DME.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Real-World Comparison of Biosimilar Ranibizumab (Ranieyes) and Innovator Ranibizumab (Lucentis/Accentrix) Across Multiple Retinal Vascular Diseases (The BRIO Study).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Preclinical evaluation of AL-001, a gene therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Exerkines in diabetic retinopathy: from mechanisms to therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIntravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the standard treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and other retinal vascular diseases. Despite proven efficacy in clinical trials, real-world data suggest suboptimal persistence and adherence. This study aimed to assess therapy continuity in routine practice using pharmacy-based dispensing data in Germany, focusing on treatment with prefilled syringes (PFS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This retrospective cohort study used anonymised nationwide pharmacy sales data from Germany to evaluate patients who initiated anti-VEGF therapy with PFS between 2020 and 2023. Patient trajectories were followed from treatment initiation for up to 12 months. 46 546 therapy beginners with 297 454 anti-VEGF PFS purchases were included. Discontinuation of treatment was defined by not purchasing a relevant medication for >6 months.
resultsMean time on therapy for all patients was 8.1±8.2 months (median=5.5) with 6.9±6.1 purchases (median=5). 20.5% of patients initiating anti-VEGF treatment stopped therapy before completing the loading phase (first three injections), and more than half of all patients discontinued treatment after 6 months. 49.4% of the patients who completed the loading phase (n all=34 895) adhered to the recommended monthly regimen. Non-adherence significantly decreased the number of injections later on (average of 7.5 vs 8.7 injections). Further, patients who stayed longer on therapy bought more PFSs within the first 6 and 12 months.
conclusionsReal-world adherence and persistence to intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in Germany are suboptimal, even with the use of PFS formulation. The high rate of early treatment discontinuation, especially during the loading phase, underscores the need for improved patient support, education and flexible treatment approaches to sustain long-term outcomes. A 'breaking point' or sensitive phase already seems to exist right at the beginning of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.