ArticleKorean journal of family medicine2026
The effectiveness of online smoking prevention program for adolescents in South Korea: a comparative analysis with traditional education.
Article in Korean journal of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adolescence and young adulthood: a critical period for lifelong health.Korean journal of family medicine · 2026Article
- Adapting and Implementing a School-Based "Implementation Intentions" Program Within FRESHAIR4Life to Prevent Smoking Initiation Among Adolescents in Greece: A Study Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and engagement of an interactive simulation-based online smoking prevention program compared to a traditional offline program for Korean adolescents. Methods: A total of 1,008 adolescents from elementary, middle, high, and alternative schools in Chungcheongnam-do Province, South Korea participated in this study from October 1 to 31, 2021. The offline program consisted of 2-hour lectures by teachers, whereas the online program included six interactive peer-oriented video modules. The evaluation compared and analyzed the survey results measuring changes in smoking-related knowledge and attitudes before and after each program, as well as the level of interest in and satisfaction with education. Results: When comparing the pre- and post-intervention scores between the two groups, no statistically significant differences were found except for a decreased belief that smoking helps relieve stress (F=12.125, P=0.001). However, withingroup comparisons revealed that the online smoking prevention program led to positive changes in most smokingrelated knowledge and attitude items, including reduced beliefs about smoking as a stress reliever (P<0.001) and lower misconceptions about the harm of e-cigarettes (P<0.001). In terms of engagement and satisfaction, the online program received significantly higher scores for interest (P<0.001), knowledge improvement (P<0.001), and program recommendations (P=0.021). Conclusion: The online smoking prevention program was as effective as the traditional offline approach in enhancing smoking-related knowledge and attitudes. Moreover, its superior engagement and time efficiency highlight its strong potential as an effective alternative or complementary strategy to conventional school-based programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.