Trial reportJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Cost Savings from Integrating Behavioral Health in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial with Karen Refugees.
Trial report in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03788408 (Effects of Intensive Psychotherapy and Case Management for Karen Refugees in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Intensive Psychotherapy and Case Management for Karen Refugees in Primary Care: A Randomized Control Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many refugees experience exposure to chronic and traumatic stressors that can lead to complex mental health and other health care needs. The integration of behavioral health into primary care is a promising approach for addressing complex health needs; however, it has been understudied with refugee and immigrant populations. Using a pragmatic randomized control trial design, this study examined inpatient and outpatient health service utilization and associated costs of a primary care-based intensive psychotherapy and case management intervention for 214 Karen refugees with major depression compared to care as usual over time. Results indicated the addition of the behavioral health intervention was associated with reduced inpatient healthcare costs vs. care as usual, shorter hospital stays, and improved patient status at discharge. The average inpatient cost saving exceeded $8,000 per patient among the intervention group. After controlling for key patient characteristics, patients who received the intervention accrued lower outpatient costs as compared to care as usual over 18 months. Findings suggested the integrated behavioral health intervention resulted in lower healthcare costs among refugees with complex health needs engaged in primary health care. Future research is needed to better understand long-term effects and further optimize care for refugees.Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03788408. Registered 20 Dec 2018. Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.