ArticleCancer medicine2025
The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on the Survival of Stage IV NSCLC Patients.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on the Survival of Stage IV NSCLC Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith treatment strategies for cancer constantly evolving, the multidisciplinary team (MDT) plays a key role in optimizing cancer care, but its real-world impact on survival remains unclear. This study aims to examine the impact of MDT on overall survival (OS) among patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on real-world data including all eligible patients.
methodPatients with stage IV NSCLC who were admitted for the first time to Shandong Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 were divided into MDT group and non-MDT group according to MDT meeting involvement. Follow-up period extended from January 1, 2021, to May 31, 2024. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze survival differences, while Cox proportional hazards models were employed to identify factors associated with overall survival.
resultOne thousand six hundred and sixty-four patients were included. No statistical differences were found between the MDT group (n = 1238) and the Non-MDT group (n = 426) in baseline characteristics, but differences were observed in treatment modalities. The MDT group exhibited a longer median overall survival compared to the Non-MDT group (26.25 vs. 21.42 months; log-rank χ
conclusionMDT can effectively reduce mortality risk. Future implementation requires recognizing its potential additional benefits and developing tailored strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.