ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025
Stainability of Polished and Glazed Printed Monolithic Zirconia After Coffee Thermocycling.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stainability of Polished and Glazed Printed Monolithic Zirconia After Coffee Thermocycling.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study assessed the impact of the method of manufacturing, surface treatment, and thickness on the stainability of zirconia after thermocycling.
methodsTwenty 0.5 × 10 mm and 20 1 × 10 mm zirconia disks were fabricated using a milling machine. Also, 20 0.5 × 10 mm and 20 1 × 10 mm zirconia disks were fabricated using a 3D printer. After sintering, samples were subjected to one of the two surface treatments (n = 10). Eight study groups were arranged as (1) 0.5 mm printed-polished, (2) 1 mm printed-polished, (3) 0.5 mm printed-glazed, (4) 1 mm printed-glazed, (5) 0.5 mm milled-polished, (6) 1 mm milled-polished, (7) 0.5 mm milled-glazed, and (8) 1 mm milled-glazed. CIELab values were measured with a spectrophotometer before and after 10,000 thermal cycles in coffee solution. ΔE
resultsAlthough all mean ΔE
conclusionsPrinted zirconia had less color stability than milled zirconia. Glazing provided the lower color change for both milled and printed zirconia. Thicker milled-polished zirconia had a better color stability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Although the color stainability of printed zirconia was more than milled zirconia, it showed clinically acceptable color change values along with the milled zirconia, regardless of the method of surface treatment and thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.