Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Volunteers with and without a history of head and neck cancer swallowing, saliva, and QOL in head/neck cancer.
Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This observational cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate swallowing in volunteers with and without a history of head and neck cancer using electromyographic amplitude, salivary flow, and quality of life. We analyzed 30 volunteers, 15 with a history of cancer (test group), and 15 without (control group), all wearing bimaxillary complete dentures for at least 6 months. Electromyographic amplitude of the masseter, temporal, and suprahyoid muscles was assessed during mandibular rest and during swallowing of nectar, liquid, pudding, and solid foods, using a surface electromyograph. Salivary flow was measured by collecting unstimulated saliva from volunteers while wearing their dentures. Dysphagia and its impact on quality of life were assessed using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Data were analyzed using normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk) and appropriate statistical tests (T Student or Mann-Whitney). No statistically significant differences were found between the test and control groups in electromyographic amplitude of the temporal, masseter, and suprahyoid muscles during rest (p = 0.468/0.663/0.619) and swallowing (p = 0.240/0.830/0.870 for nectar, p = 0.101/0.760/0.838 for liquid, p = 0.056/0.902/0.967 for pudding, p = 0.494/0.805/0.116 for solid). There was also no significant difference in salivary flow (p = 0.438). However, significant differences were found in MDADI scores (p < 0.001), especially in the emotional domain (p < 0.001), indicating a major impact of dysphagia on quality of life in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41176586What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.