Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41176573›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

The non-opponent nature of colour afterimages.

Christoph Witzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christoph WitzelSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. c.witzel@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9944-2420

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 222641018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary colour afterimages have driven our understanding of human colour perception since the foundations of modern colour science. Despite their fundamental importance, decades of research have failed to establish the precise nature of colour afterimages and the neural mechanisms of adaptation at their origin. To date, it is unclear whether afterimage formation is caused by adaptation in the cone photoreceptors, of colour-opponent neurons in the subcortical pathway, or requires the assumption of yet unknown cortical mechanisms. To establish the neural mechanisms underlying afterimage formation, this study exploited the fact that different candidate mechanisms make fundamentally different predictions about the hue and saturation of afterimages. Using tailormade experimental paradigms, the exact colours perceived in afterimages were measured for a large range of inducers to test those predictions. Three experiments tested predictions of afterimage hue and saturation with varying inducer hues, and changes of afterimage hues depending on inducer saturation (Exp. 1.a: 8 colours, tested across 31 participants; Exp. 1.b: 24 colours, tested across 52 participants; Exp.2.a: 72 colours, replicated with 10 participants; Exp. 2b: 72 colours, replicated with 2 participants; Exp. 3: 48-216 colours, replicated with 5 participants). Results across all three experiments very consistently demonstrated that afterimage colours are not colour-opponent, as widely assumed, but closely follow a quantitative model of adaptation in the cone photoreceptors. These findings unequivocally establish the origin of afterimages along the hierarchy of neural processing, hence resolving all prevailing misconceptions and contradictions. By linking the perceptual nature and the neural origin of afterimages, the present paradigm also provides a technique for probing those neural mechanisms behaviourally and in first-person experience.

Identifiers

PMID41176573
PMCPMC12579601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.