ArticleEuropean radiology2026
6-Deoxy-6-[
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluoro-L-ascorbic acid ([¹⁸F]FAA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and compare it with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) PET/CT. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were retrospectively collected from patients who were clinically suspected or diagnosed with postoperative metastatic DTC between September 2023 and May 2024. Quantification was performed using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR). Histopathological outcomes and clinical follow-up served as the reference standard for final diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using McNemar's test, and tracer uptake was analyzed via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsA total of 85 participants (median age, 51 years; IQR, 38-61 years; 45 women) were evaluated. For cervical lymph nodes (LNs), [¹⁸F]FAA showed superior sensitivity (88% vs. 67%), accuracy (82% vs. 69%), and negative predictive value (78% vs. 57%) (all p < 0.001), with comparable specificity (72% vs. 74%, p = 0.64) and positive predictive value (84% vs. 81%; p = 0.44) than [
conclusion[ KEY POINTS: Question Is 6-Deoxy-6-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
41176553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.