ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for glioblastoma (GBM): current clinical insights, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Locoregional CAR T-Cell Trials for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma: Implications for Neuro-Oncology Practice.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Integrating Endovascular Drug Delivery into the Therapeutic Landscape of Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- In vivo CAR-M therapy: advancing precision delivery and programmable immune remodeling.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Fully Humanized Bispecific T Cell Engager Shows Potent Activity in Central Nervous System and Peripheral Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Precision Immunotherapeutics for Glioblastoma: Current Approaches and Emerging Strategies in 2026.Cells · 2026Review
- Harnessing γδ T cells for B7-H3-targeting CAR therapy to enhance anti-tumor therapy in glioblastoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating CAR-T therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: Mechanisms, synergy, and optimized strategies in NSCLC.iScience · 2026Review
- Reshaping the immunosuppressive glioma microenvironment: mechanisms, biomarkers, and emerging immunotherapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Functional genomics-guided design of CAR-T and CAR-NK therapies in hematological malignancies: aligning cellular engineering with immune escape and microenvironmental resistance.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Current Status and Evolution of Immunotherapy in Glioma Management.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most lethal primary brain cancer with a median survival of under 2 years despite current best treatment practices. Early immunotherapies, including checkpoint blockade and vaccines, showed safety and immunogenicity but no survival benefit. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T treatments in GBM trials have yielded feasibility and antitumor signals but still lack long-term control. This review synthesizes recent clinical and mechanistic data to establish priorities for clinical trial design, patient selection, and treatment development aimed at achieving durable responses in GBM.Recent trials highlight two consistent observations regarding the delivery of CAR T treatment. First, that CAR T cells can be effectively delivered peripherally rather than requiring direct intracranial administration. And second, multi-antigen, regionally delivered products can induce measurable intracranial responses. These findings indicate that access across the blood-brain barrier is feasible, but persistent function is limited by tumor antigen heterogeneity and an immunosuppressive, myeloid-dominated microenvironment that accelerates T-cell exhaustion.Emerging development strategies reflect these constraints. Broader antigen recognition is being pursued through bivalent and engager-secreting constructs. Locoregional delivery through cerebrospinal fluid spaces enables repeated exposure at multifocal sites. Resistance modules targeting TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor-beta) signaling and myeloid suppression are being investigated to prolong persistence. Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacodynamic monitoring, such as measuring cytokines, chemokines, and CAR cell kinetics, may support adaptive dosing and minimize corticosteroid use. Patient selection criteria increasingly favor individuals with confirmed target expression, sufficient intratumoral T-cell infiltration, and minimal steroid exposure.Advances in manufacturing, including point-of-care platforms, allogeneic products, and in vivo CAR engineering, aim to shorten production timelines and improve access. Collectively, regional delivery, multi-antigen recognition, and microenvironment resistance constitute the current framework for translating CAR T therapy in GBM from transient responses toward sustained benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.