Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41176223›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2026

Sustainable tea plantations: Harnessing chemical-microbial synergy and smart application triangulation for targeted weed control.

Lan Chen, Xiaolong Yang, Zhongzeng Su, Xiong Guan, Zixuan Wang, Tianpei Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lan ChenState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity & Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education & Biopesticide Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Xiaolong YangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity & Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education & Biopesticide Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Zhongzeng SuState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity & Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education & Biopesticide Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Xiong GuanState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity & Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education & Biopesticide Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Zixuan WangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity & Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education & Biopesticide Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China. Electronic address: wangzx@fafu.edu.cn.
Tianpei HuangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity & Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education & Biopesticide Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China. Electronic address: tianpeihuang@fafu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 200 weed species-predominantly from the Poaceae and Asteraceae families-infest tea plantations. These weeds compete aggressively with tea plants for essential resources (light, water, and nutrients), serve as reservoirs for pathogens and pests, and bioaccumulate phytotoxic compounds (e.g., pyrrolizidine alkaloids and heavy metals), jeopardizing agroecosystem health. Although chemical herbicides are currently the most effective and economical method, their long-term overuse poses ecological risks and threatens agricultural sustainability, highlighting an urgent need for sustainable alternatives. Although chemical herbicides remain the most effective and economical method, their long-term overuse causes ecological risks and challenges agricultural sustainability. AIM OF REVIEW: This review synthesizes current knowledge on sustainable weed management in tea plantations by evaluating the strengths and limitations of chemical and microbial herbicides. It further advances the novel concepts of chemical-microbial synergy and smart application triangulation-integrated strategies not explicitly addressed in previous reviews-that provide new directions for developing next-generation sustainable weed control. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: This review systematically examines three critical aspects of weed management in tea plantations: (1) characterizing weed biodiversity and assessing multidimensional threats through taxonomic profiling of invasive species, with particular focus on their cascading impacts on tea agroecosystems including resource competition, disease transmission, and soil toxicity; (2) evaluating the mechanisms and trade-offs of current herbicide approaches through comparative analysis of chemical herbicides (noting their efficiency but ecological concerns) and microbial herbicides (considering their environmental benefits but field performance variability); (3) exploring sustainable optimization strategies by investigating innovative approaches such as precision herbicide formulations (nano-formulations, smart delivery systems) and integrated weed management solutions (microbiome engineering, epigenome editing).

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisHerbicidesPlant WeedsWeed ControlAgricultureHerbicidesChemical herbicidesHerbicide performanceMicrobial herbicidesMultidimensional hazardsSustainable weed managementTea plantation weeds

Identifiers

PMID41176223
PMCPMC13316500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.