ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2025
Cracking the resistance code: The molecular reclassification of cancer and precision therapy strategies.
Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinesins in Cancer Drug Resistance: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Targeting, and Translational Potential.Cancers · 2026Review
- Cancer Heterogeneity and Cancer Cell Plasticity: Molecular Mechanisms and Precision Therapy.MedComm · 2026Review
- Trojan horses at leptomeningeal cellular gates: Antibody-drug conjugates deliver cytotoxic payloads.Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- What is worth knowing about peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer?Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The molecular reclassification of cancer has enabled a therapeutic revolution. We now know that metastatic cancers have heterogenous molecular landscapes, which can differ within and between histologies, and may also vary between tumor sites in a single individual, and even between clones in a single tumor. Moreover, clonal evolution develops as cancers metastasize and throughout the course of treatment, which can lead to therapeutic resistance. Treating disease early and personalized therapeutic approaches including molecularly targeted therapies, along with N-of-1 individualized, biomarker-based combination approaches may improve outcomes and address resistance. Reassessing the tumor landscape throughout treatment with frequent tissue biopsies and with liquid biopsies at progression can help identify resistance pathways and provide information for selecting more effective later-line therapies. The heterogenous nature of metastatic tumors at different sites and within a single site can lead to mixed responses; thus, combination therapeutic approaches and understanding the sources of tumor heterogeneity is key to providing durable therapeutic benefit. Elucidating and targeting critical drivers, such as fusions, is also important. In the presence of undruggable key tumor drivers, targeting the immunome, RNA transcripts, and/or cell-surface proteins may circumvent the issue posed by a molecular driver that is not actionable. For tumors with a large number of alterations, exploiting synthetic lethality, precision immunotherapy, functional studies, antibody-drug conjugates, and computational approaches may optimize therapeutic efficacy without targeting every critical driver. Given ongoing clonal evolution and the heterogeneity of metastatic tumors, evolving precision medicine technologies and therapeutic approaches will be critical to improving outcomes for patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.