ArticlePatient education and counseling2026
Parent and adolescent perspectives on decision-making involvement: A qualitative comparison in sickle cell and diabetes clinics.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare adolescent and parent perceptions of decision-making involvement (DMI) in clinic visits for sickle cell disease (SCD) and type 1 diabetes (T1D), and to identify behaviors that facilitate or limit adolescent participation.
methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with adolescents with sickle cell disease (SCD; N = 14; 100 % Black) and type 1 diabetes (T1D; N = 19; 71 % White) and their parents. Using an inductive grounded theory approach, responses to questions about adolescent, parent, and clinician behaviors related to adolescent DMI were reviewed, coded, and sorted into categories and themes.
resultsOverall, many adolescent, parent, and clinician behaviors related to adolescent DMI were described as similar across the two groups. Differences were noted in that some adolescents with SCD occasionally made independent decisions during clinic visits, parents more often acted as facilitators and primary communicators of adolescents with T1D, clinicians more often directed discussions and recommendations primarily to parents of adolescents with SCD, and DMI was attributed to maturity and longstanding relationships with clinicians among adolescents with SCD, whereas among adolescents with T1D, it was attributed to clinician and parent behaviors.
conclusionFindings from the study highlight the importance of trusting relationships between patients and clinicians, and specific parent and clinician behaviors for facilitating adolescent DMI. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Tailored approaches may contribute to increased participation in medical decision making and improved health outcomes, particularly among racially diverse adolescents with chronic health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.