Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41175414›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2025

Comparison of the effect of preoperative glycopyrrolate and penehyclidine hydrochloride on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Hui Yan, Renrong Ao, Chenghui Fan, Rui Xia

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hui YanDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2314-0463
Renrong AoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangling County People's Hospital, China.
Chenghui FanDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, China.
Rui XiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of preoperative glycopyrrolate and penehyclidine hydrochloride on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsThis prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial enrolled 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to the glycopyrrolate group, penehyclidine hydrochloride group, or normal saline group. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, hemodynamic parameters, anesthetic consumption, duration of postanesthesia care unit stay, and other perioperative adverse events were recorded.ResultsThe incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 1 h in the penehyclidine hydrochloride group was significantly lower than that in the normal saline and glycopyrrolate groups. The heart rate at immediately prior to anesthesia induction, 1 min after endotracheal intubation, the start of surgery, 2 min after pneumoperitoneum, and cholecyst dissection and mean arterial pressure at 1 min after endotracheal intubation and the start of surgery in the normal saline group were significantly lower than those in the glycopyrrolate group. The heart rate at immediately prior to anesthesia induction, 1 min after endotracheal intubation, the start of surgery, and 2 min after pneumoperitoneum and mean arterial pressure at 1 min after endotracheal intubation in the penehyclidine hydrochloride group were markedly lower than those in the glycopyrrolate group. The incidence of bradycardia in the normal saline and penehyclidine hydrochloride groups was significantly higher than that in the glycopyrrolate group.ConclusionsPenehyclidine hydrochloride is more effective than glycopyrrolate in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, particularly in the early postoperative period.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGlycopyrrolatePostoperative Nausea and VomitingQuinuclidinesAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareProspective StudiesGlycopyrrolatepenehyclidineQuinuclidinesgeneral anesthesiaGlycopyrrolatelaparoscopic cholecystectomypenehyclidine hydrochloridepostoperative nausea and vomitingpremedication

Identifiers

PMID41175414
PMCPMC12580546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.