ArticleJournal of community health2026
Generational Perception Towards the Tobacco Generation End Game Policy in Malaysia.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Generation End Game (GEG) policy plan represents a groundbreaking initiative by the Malaysian government aimed at creating a smoke-free generation. This cross-sectional study aims to explore the factors influencing knowledge, attitude and perception of Malaysian adolescents towards the policy. A quantitative pre- and post-test survey was conducted among 731 adolescents born in 2007 and above across Malaysia, following a brief informational introduction to the GEG policy. This study utilized ANCOVA and binomial logistic regression to assess the association between various sociodemographic factors with knowledge, attitude and perceptions of the GEG. The results reveal that gender, tobacco-related experiences, peer influences, and health-related beliefs significantly impacted perception outcomes (p < 0.05). Female participants were significantly more likely to express supportive perceptions compared to male participants (unadjusted OR = 2.538, 95% CI = 1.598-4.030, p < 0.001). Non-smokers/vapers were more supportive of the GEG than smokers/vapers (unadjusted OR = 3.308, 95% CI = 2.032-5.384, p < 0.001). Participants who identified tobacco use as "definitely harmful" exhibited significantly greater support (unadjusted OR = 2.563, 95% CI = 1.522-4.315, p < 0.001). Individuals who reported no prior tobacco education were significantly less supportive (unadjusted OR = 0.321, 95% CI = 0.114-0.90, p = 0.031). The findings underline the need for targeted educational campaigns to address knowledge gaps and improve public understanding of the policy. Efforts to enhance perceptions of the harmfulness of tobacco use and its broader societal impacts could further bolster support for the GEG policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.