Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41175302›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

Facilitators and Barriers to Collaboration Between General Practice and Sickness Benefits Office in Return to Work Processes-A Scoping Review.

Anne Grøndahl Poulsen, Ingmar van Meerkerk, Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen, Nanna Rolving, Lotte Groth Jensen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Grøndahl PoulsenDEFACTUM Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Alle 15, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark. anngrora@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-1224
Ingmar van MeerkerkErasmus School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7279-2607
Camilla Palmhøj NielsenDEFACTUM Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Alle 15, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-3463
Nanna RolvingDEFACTUM Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Alle 15, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-7278
Lotte Groth JensenDEFACTUM Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Alle 15, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1447-965X

Funding

Public Health in Central Denmark Region a collaboration between municipalities and the region A4023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on collaboration between sickness benefit offices and general practice in return to work (RTW) processes, to map existing research, and to identify facilitators and barriers to successful collaboration.

methodsThis review adhered to established scoping review methodologies. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature was conducted across six databases. Two researchers independently performed screening and data extraction. Facilitators and barriers were thematically analysed, and tentative findings were discussed with a reference group.

resultsThe search yielded 8477 unique studies, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed persistent challenges over the past two decades. Most studies used qualitative methods, and the majority were conducted in a Scandinavian context. Written communication was the predominant collaborative activity reported in the studies. Barriers were more frequently identified than facilitators. Commonly reported barriers to successful collaboration included stereotyping, differing priorities, and an over-reliance on written communication. Facilitators included face-to-face meetings and high-quality written communication. Although facilitators have not been extensively studied, our findings emphasize the interconnection between barriers and facilitators, indicating that facilitators can provide strategies to address these barriers. Furthermore, we observed a lack of consensus in the literature regarding key concepts, such as'collaboration'. DISCUSSION: Based on the findings, we recommend that future research focus on achieving conceptual clarity and examining the underlying conditions that influence the potential for collaboration between general practice and sickness benefits offices in RTW processes.

Indexed as

General practice;Interprofessional collaborationIntersectoral collaborationReturn to workReviewSickness benefits office

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.