Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41175289›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Sonographic evaluation of lungs and diaphragm as a predictor for extubation failure in early preterm neonates: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Gaurav Gautam, Mayank Priyadarshi, Suman Chaurasia, Poonam Singh, Sriparna Basu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaurav GautamDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7066-7451
Mayank PriyadarshiDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. priyadarshi.aiims@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4436-6181
Suman ChaurasiaDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3871-5322
Poonam SinghDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-0862
Sriparna BasuDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-4849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung and diaphragm ultrasound has been shown to reliably predict extubation failure (EF) in adults and children; however, its role in preterm infants remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) aeration score and diaphragmatic indices for predicting EF in early preterm neonates. In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study, preterm infants < 34 weeks intubated for more than 24 h were enrolled. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound was done 1 h prior to extubation. LUS scoring was performed by two independent blinded assessors. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of lung and diaphragm ultrasound for predicting EF within 72 h. We enrolled 45 infants, of whom 20 (44%) had EF. Gestation and birth weight were significantly lower in the EF group. The median (IQR) LUS aeration score was significantly higher in the EF group, compared to the success group [8.75 (5-12) vs. 4 (0-7); p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences in diaphragmatic excursion or diaphragmatic thickness fraction between the two groups. On logistic regression, LUS remained an independent predictor of EF (odds ratio 5.40, 95% CI 1.57-18.50; p = 0.007). The area under the ROC curve was 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-1.00) for LUS aeration score, with an optimal cut-off score of ≥ 7 having 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity in predicting EF.

conclusionsIn preterm infants < 34 weeks, LUS demonstrated reliable accuracy in predicting EF within 72 h. Measurements of diaphragmatic indices were feasible but did not prove to be good predictors of EF. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The incidence of extubation failure in preterm infants remains substantial, with reported rates varying between 10% and 80%. • There are no reliable tools currently that can predict extubation failure accurately in preterm neonates. WHAT IS NEW: • In preterm infants 34 weeks, lung ultrasound demonstrated reliable accuracy in predicting extubation failure within 72 hours. • Measurements of diaphragmatic indices were feasible on ultrasound but did not prove good predictors of extubation failure.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationDiaphragmLungVentilator WeaningFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesROC CurveTreatment FailureUltrasonographyDiaphragm ultrasoundExtubationLung ultrasoundPreterm neonates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.