ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2026
Burnout and resilience in emergency medicine health professionals.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological wellbeing of healthcare professionals in regional, rural and remote emergency departments: an integrative review.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms, Occupational Stress, Emotional Exhaustion, and Quiet Quitting in Workplace-Violence-Exposed Turkish Prehospital Emergency Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Patient Safety in Critical Care Settings: Lessons from a Multidimensional Special Issue.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a flow state scale for healthcare professionals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency physicians (EPs) are particularly susceptible to burnout because of the high-stress environment in which they operate, characterized by rapid decision-making, long shifts, and limited resources. This review aims to explore the prevalence and contributing factors to burnout among EPs and to describe different interventions to mitigate this issue. The most used tool to measure burnout is the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), which evaluates emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Various studies identified both organizational and individual risk factors contributing to high burnout rates, exceeding 70% in some regions. Key organizational factors include increased workload, poor collegial relationships, and work-life conflict, while individual factors involve maladaptive coping strategies. This paper emphasizes the importance of personal and system resilience, defined as the ability to manage stress and thrive under hardship, in combating burnout. It highlights the Stanford Model of Professional Fulfillment, which focuses on cultivating a culture of wellness, enhancing practice efficiency, and fostering personal resilience through self-care and peer support. According to our literature review, proposed interventions include improving shift length and scheduling, managing workload, and reducing bureaucratic tasks. These measures aim to create a supportive environment that prioritizes clinician well-being and enhances job satisfaction. Recognizing the need for a multifaceted approach, this paper suggests combining organizational changes with individual support strategies to effectively reduce burnout rates. This paper underscores the necessity for systemic changes in EM settings to ensure sustainable healthcare delivery and improved outcomes for both patients and healthcare professionals. Implementing these strategies can lead to a more resilient workforce, capable of providing high-quality care while maintaining personal well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.