ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025
Computational identification of cross-reactive TCR epitopes with ARDitox.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MHCXGraph: a graph-based approach to detecting T-cell receptor cross-reactivity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Advances in delivery technologies-powered cancer vaccines.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCellular immunotherapies, such as those utilizing T lymphocytes expressing native or engineered T cell receptors (TCRs), have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy. However, some engineered high-affinity TCRs have caused fatal off-target immunotoxicity due to targeting epitopes later found to be expressed by both tumor cells and healthy tissues. Unfortunately, TCRs can be cross-reactive to epitopes with highly distinct sequences, making prediction difficult, and the exquisite sequence specificity of TCRs means that safety studies in mice miss human-specific epitopes.
methodsTo address this issue, we developed ARDitox, a novel in silico method based on computational immunology and artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting and analyzing potential TCR off-target toxicities. We tested the performance of ARDitox on four TCRs reported to target tumor-associated antigens, two of which are known to cause clinical immunotoxicity (MAGEA3
resultsARDitox confirmed the previously identified immunotoxic epitopes. We then expanded our analyses to a novel TCR targeting the tumor-associated antigen NLGN4X, frequently upregulated in gliomas. For this target, ARDitox identified a cross-reactive peptide that would not have been found using mouse models, highlighting the value of our computational approach.
conclusionsOur findings underscore the value of the ARDitox in silico method for the early and reliable identification of off-target epitopes for further preclinical evaluation. This platform strongly supports the development of safer TCR-mediated immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.