ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Quantitative automated pupillometry in pseudoexfoliation and evaluation of contributory factors.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improvement of dynamic pupillary function after cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome: a six-month longitudinal pupillometry study.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study differences in automated pupillometry parameters between patients with Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) and healthy individuals, and to assess contributory parameters.
methodsForty phakic patients with PEX (with or without early-moderate glaucoma) were categorised into Affected (eyes with clinical signs of PEX present, n = 55 eyes) and Unaffected group (clinically normal fellow eyes, n = 23 eyes), along with 80 age-matched healthy controls. Participants were tested on an automated pupillometer. Static pupillometry was tested at high photopic (100 cd/m
resultsGlaucoma was present in 12.8% of PEX (n = 10). Static pupillary diameters (PD) were significantly different in both Affected and Unaffected groups of PEX, compared to controls. Both PEX groups showed significantly lower amplitude of contraction and percent pupillary contraction (p < 0.001), slower velocities of contraction and dilation (p < 0.001), and increased latency of contraction compared to controls (p = 0.001). The Affected and Unaffected groups did not differ in pupillometry parameters. Inferior quadrant RNFLT had a positive correlation with multiple pupillary parameters. An equation was derived by linear regression to predict MPD. MPD = 4.34 + 0.61 × Scotopic PD - 0.37 × Mesopic PD + 0.35 × Velocity of contraction.
conclusionAbnormal pupillary kinetics are present in both eyes of patients with PEX. PEX is associated with asymptomatic inferior quadrant RNFLT thinning. Pupillometry can be used to predict maximum pupillary dilation in PEX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.