Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41175235›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2025

Safety of COMT-inhibitors in parkinson's disease: a phase-IV comparative study on adverse events of Tolcapone, Entacapone and Opicapone.

Pasquale Maria Pecoraro, Simona Paola Carbone, Francesco Bugamelli, Lazzaro di Biase

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pasquale Maria PecoraroResearch Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-8020
Simona Paola CarboneResearch Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BugamelliResearch Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2083-3241
Lazzaro di BiaseOperative Research Unit of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. lazzaro.dibiase@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-757X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors-Tolcapone, Entacapone, and Opicapone-are adjunct therapies for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), improving motor control. Their distinct safety profiles may influence clinical decisions and patient adherence. This study provides a comprehensive descriptive analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported for these drugs and a comparative safety assessment based on post-marketing AE reports and drug sales data from 2018 to 2023. A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). AEs were categorized by severity and compared across COMT-inhibitors. Drug utilization trends were evaluated through retail and hospital sales data, expressed as standard units and market share. AE incidence was normalized for drug exposure using the median number of pills per day. Statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher's exact test to assess differences in AE rates. Entacapone was sold 100 times more than Opicapone and 1000 times more than Tolcapone. When normalized for drug exposure, total AEs were significantly lower for Entacapone than Opicapone (OR = 0.0435, p < 0.001) and Tolcapone (OR = 0.1397, p < 0.001). Tolcapone also exhibited a significantly lower AE risk than Opicapone (OR = 0.3119, p < 0.001). Similarly, Entacapone had significantly fewer serious AEs than Opicapone (OR = 0.0732, p < 0.001) and Tolcapone (OR = 0.0872, p < 0.001), indicating a more favorable safety profile. This is the first study directly comparing the safety profiles of COMT-inhibitors head-to-head. Entacapone appears to be the safest long-term COMT-inhibitor, with the lowest risk of both serious and non-serious AEs. A long-term, prospective clinical trial is warranted to overcome retrospective limitations and confirm these findings.

Indexed as

COMT-inhibitorsFDAParkinson's disease (PD)Phase-IV study

Identifiers

PMID41175235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.