ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Posttraumatic growth and wellbeing in three countries after COVID-19: analysis using a random intercept cross-lagged panel model.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The long-term relationship between posttraumatic growth (PTG) and wellbeing after the COVID-19 pandemic remains unclear. This study aimed to examine their levels and changes at the individual level over time as well as to explore the bidirectional associations in Japan, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US). Four waves of online surveys were administered in July and October 2023 and January and April 2024 to residents aged 20-74 years. The wave 1 included 400 participants from Japan, 398 from the UK, and 393 from the US, of whom 308, 226, and 157, respectively, completed all four waves. A two-way multivariate analysis of covariance was conducted to analyze the differences in PTG and wellbeing by country and wave. The associations between PTG and wellbeing were analyzed using a random intercept cross-lagged panel model to assess the within-person associations. PTG and wellbeing were lower in Japan than in the UK and the US. PTG in the UK and the US declined over time. The random intercepts of PTG and wellbeing showed significant positive associations across all three countries, whereas no significant associations were generally observed between the within-person fluctuations of PTG and wellbeing. In all three countries, the associations between subjective economic status and the random intercepts of wellbeing were consistently strong. PTG and wellbeing are primarily associated at the between-person level, with little evidence of dynamic within-person effects. The causal or dynamic role of PTG in promoting emotional wellbeing is attenuated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.