ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Bridging the gap: understanding and enhancing the collaborative relationship between spine clinicians and researchers of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS).
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEffective collaboration between clinicians and researchers is essential for advancing spine health research and improving patient care. However, differing priorities can hinder interdisciplinary cooperation. This study explores the perspectives, interests, and collaborative experiences of clinicians and researchers within the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS), aiming to identify ways to improve collaboration.
methodsA two-phase survey was conducted between August and October 2024. A pilot test refined the survey, which was then distributed via Google Forms to ISSLS members. The survey included six sections: demographics; research interests; collaboration perceptions; understanding of clinical and research work; qualitative assessment; and final feedback. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests assessed group differences. A modified Content Validity Ratio (CVR) quantified consensus on high-interest topics. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe survey was sent to 382 ISSLS members; 80 responded (20.9%), including 55% clinicians and 45% researchers. "Low Back Pain" received high CVR scores from both researchers (1.00) and clinicians (0.86). Clinicians favored "Surgical Outcomes" (p = 0.008) and "Fusion" (p < 0.001), while researchers preferred "Cell, Signalling, Mechanotransduction" (p = 0.018). Clinicians overestimated researchers' interest in "Minimally invasive and robotic surgery" (44.4% perceived vs. 2.8% actual) and underestimated interest in "Chronic pain and psychosocial factors" (15.6% perceived vs. 41.7% actual) (χ² = 25.95, p = 0.0002). Main barriers included "lack of time" (86.1% researchers, 62.2% clinicians) and "differing professional focuses" (47.2% researchers, 35.6% clinicians). Benefits for clinicians included enhanced study design (60%) and knowledge exchange (57.8%); for researchers, access to clinical data (61.1%) (χ² = 33.39, p = 0.0025). Suggested improvements included joint research projects (clinicians 68.9%, researchers 72.2%) and interdisciplinary meetings. DISCUSSION: The study highlights differing priorities and mutual misunderstandings between clinicians and researchers. Despite this, both groups agree on the importance of early collaboration in research development. Improving interdisciplinary communication and creating shared opportunities could strengthen collaboration. These findings reflect a subset of ISSLS members and may not generalize broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.