ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Advancements in 3D modeling technologies for congenital heart disease: integrating 3D printing, virtual reality, and holograms.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence, extended reality and computational modelling in cross-sectional cardiovascular imaging in congenital heart disease: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Scientific Publication Trend: Using Advanced Technologies in Cardiovascular Disease Research in theJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review examines the application of advanced imaging technologies in pediatric cardiology, focusing on enhancing the visualization of cardiovascular anatomy in congenital heart disease (CHD). It provides an overview of key factors for adopting these tools in clinical practice, such as software options, cost considerations, and resource requirements across healthcare settings, from small, resource-limited centers to larger institutions. Emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, the paper highlights the roles of pediatric radiologists, cardiologists, engineers, and physicians with expertise in computer-aided design (CAD) for effective implementation. The review covers a range of imaging tools, from low-cost virtual reality, mixed reality, and three-dimensional (3D) printing to more advanced technologies, and explores their clinical applications in CHD. Through a literature analysis, the paper offers practical insights to help integrate and optimize these technologies, aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.