ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Entrapped Dilator in a Male-to-Female Transgender Patient: Tips and Tricks for Device Removal.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMedical cases involving foreign bodies can present unique challenges, especially when they occur in sensitive areas, such as the neovagina of a male-to-female transgender.
methodsA 32-year-old transgender woman attended a tertiary, academic-affiliated hospital and reported to insert a vaginal dilator into the neovagina after removing its base and after mild abdominal pain and difficulty in removing the dilator after multiple successful attempts, she looked for help in the emergency room.
resultsA video article demonstrates a step-by-step approach to remove the device. Under intravenous anesthesia, a neovaginoscopy was performed using a saline solution for dilation with a Bettocchi Hysteroscopy Set, equipped with a 4 mm and 30º scope, ultimately revealing the absence of fistulas or perforations. Hydrodistension probably played a major role to reduce difficulty to remove the dilator, as this was clamped with Pozzi forceps after 800 ml of infusion. Urogenital fistulas or rupture of the neovaginal vault was excluded after careful revision. Patient was discharged on the same day with a prescription for antibiotics.
conclusionsNeovaginoscopy with an important hydrodistention proved to be a method for locating and removing the entrapped dilator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.