Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Sensory processing and motor development in term infants following late-onset neonatal sepsis-a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06884969 (Investigation of Motor Development and Sensory Processing Skills in Infants With a History of Late-onset Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of Motor Development and Sensory Processing Skills in Infants With a History of Late-onset Sepsis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glycine attenuates sepsis-induced white matter injury by modulating gut microbiota.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS), defined as sepsis occurring after 72 h of life, is typically caused by pathogens acquired postnatally, either from the hospital environment or the community. This study investigates whether term infants with culture-confirmed LOS show differences in sensory processing and motor skills at 12-18 months compared to healthy peers. Participants were infants diagnosed with LOS, aged 12-18 months, and their healthy term peers. Motor development was evaluated using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition, and sensory processing skills were assessed with the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants. A total of 57 infants were included in the study: 27 infants with LOS and 30 healthy term peers (without LOS). The demographic characteristics of the infants were similar between the groups. Gross motor, fine motor, and total motor scores of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition were significantly higher in favor of the control group (p < 0.05). Among the subtests of the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants, response to tactile deep pressure, visual-tactile integration, and total score were higher in favor of the control group (p < 0.05).
conclusionCompared to their healthy term peers, term infants with LOS experience greater challenges in sensory processing and motor development. These findings provide the first evidence that LOS in term-born infants is associated with early developmental impairments in sensory and motor domains. They should undergo comprehensive evaluations at key developmental stages to support optimal outcomes and be referred to intervention programs when needed.
trial registrationThe study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with the number: NCT06884969-Registration Date: 03/13/2025. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Sepsis may contribute to white matter damage and widespread damage to premyelinating oligodendrocytes, increasing the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction later in life. • Premature infants are vulnerable to neonatal sepsis; however, it can also been seen in term newborns. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first study to concurrently evaluate sensory processing and motor development at 12-18 months in term-born infants with culture-confirmed late-onset sepsis. • Term infants with late-onset sepsis show developmental delays in both sensory processing skills and motor development compared to their peers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.