ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Pathological and radiological evaluation of ureteral wall thickness measurement in urolithiasis.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is a mainstay in the diagnosis of urolithiasis, with multiple markers on NCCT used to predict the likelihood of stone passage and to assist in pre-operative planning. Ureter wall thickness (UWT) is one such parameter, however studies evaluating inter-observer agreement and comparing to native ureteral tissue are lacking. We aim to provide the first comparison of UWT from healthy human ureters with UWT measured on NCCT; and to evaluate for inter-observer variability on NCCT measurement. Human ureters were collected from consenting adults at the time of radical nephrectomy. The pathological UWT (pUWT) was compared to the median radiological UWT (rUWT) of three independent blinded observers. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test, intraclass correlation co-efficient and Bland-Altmann analysis. Samples from 23 patients were compared with a mean pUWt 2.1mm (range: 0.89-4.11mm) and rUWT of 1.30mm (range: 1-3.52mm). There was significant variation between median rUWT and pUWT (1.3mm vs 2.1mm, p=0.0005) with rUWT underestimating pUWT by a mean of 0.72mm. The intraclass correlation co-efficient of <0.50 suggests poor intra-reader reliability with limits of agreement on Bland-Altmann analysis of 2.5mm. This study represents the first comparison of pathological and radiological UWT in human ureteric tissue. There is a significant variation in pathological and radiological measurements, with high interobserver variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41175141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.