ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Strategies for Improving Access to Effective Prostate Cancer Medications (Abiraterone and Enzalutamide) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): A Survey Among Nigerian Health Professionals.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Dual Incidence-Mortality Patterns of Prostate Cancer Across SDI Regions, 1990-2021: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Global Burden of Disease 2021.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Cancer Prevention, Control, and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Progress and Challenges.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Prostate Cancer Management in Nigeria: A mini-review of up-to-date treatment options.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThe burden of prostate cancer (PCa) is disproportionately concentrated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Abiraterone and enzalutamide have improved survival rates and quality of life for men with PCa. However, cost constraints limit access to these medications due to limited insurance coverage and out-of-pocket payments. The survey assessed the current practices and opinions of Nigerian clinical oncologists and urologists regarding the use of low dose abiraterone and enzalutamide for the management of metastatic PCa.MethodsThis survey consisted of twenty multiple-choice questions, distributed via Google Forms to urologists and oncologists in Nigeria from August to November 2024. It examined current practices, awareness of effective dose reduction strategies, and opinions on their cost-effectiveness. The collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel, and responses were presented using tables and charts.ResultsA total of 104 respondents completed the survey. Among them, 37 (36%) reported that 61%-80% of their patients initially presented with advanced PCa. Additionally, 55 respondents (53%) were unaware of studies and guidelines regarding low-dose abiraterone. Furthermore, 66% of clinicians indicated that fewer than 20% of their patients could afford abiraterone, and 91 (87.5%) noted that few could afford enzalutamide. Moreover, 92 (89%) respondents believed that low-dose abiraterone would improve compliance, while 76% felt that reducing the enzalutamide dose would also enhance compliance and decrease patient costs. Sixty percent (58%) of respondents were willing to switch to low-dose abiraterone.ConclusionThe survey revealed limited awareness of landmark studies on dose-reduction strategies for abiraterone and enzalutamide. These strategies have the potential to enhance affordability and compliance in the management of advanced PCa in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.