Observational studyTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Unveiling the causes of bronchiectasis exacerbations: insights from a single-center study.
Observational study in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBronchiectasis exacerbations are a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. While environmental factors, such as viral infections, are well-established triggers for exacerbations, the role of intrinsic factors, particularly chronic bacterial infections, remains incompletely understood.
objectivesIn this context, we sought to investigate the impact of chronic bacterial infections using the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment, providing a unique opportunity to assess the effects of reduced external infections.
designA retrospective observational cohort study was conducted involving patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.
methodsData were collected via telephone interviews and medical record reviews, comparing exacerbation rates before (2019) and during (2020) the pandemic. The difference in exacerbation rates between 2020 and 2019 (delta exacerbations) served as the dependent variable in a multiple regression model.
resultsSixty-three patients were included in the analysis. Those without chronic bacterial infections showed a significant reduction in exacerbations during the pandemic: mean (SD) was 1.06 (1.3) versus 1.61 (1.3), respectively (
conclusionWhile social distancing effectively reduced bronchiectasis exacerbations in patients without chronic bacterial infections, those with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.