ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2026
Towards Rapid Calibration of Bioprocess Quantification Models Using Single Compound Raman Spectra: A Comparison of Four Approaches.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Raman spectral unmixing for quantitative analysis of multicomponent amino acid mixtures.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Variable-specific preprocessing enables cross-scale transferable Raman models from high-throughput bioreactor data.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Towards Rapid Calibration of Bioprocess Quantification Models Using Single Compound Raman Spectra: A Comparison of Four Approaches.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-line Raman spectroscopy combined with accurate quantification models can offer detailed real-time insights into a bioprocess by monitoring key process parameters. However, traditional approaches for model calibration require extensive data collection from multiple bioreactor runs, resulting in process-specific models that are sensitive to operational changes. These challenges can be tackled by simplifying experimental data generation or implementation of computational methods to obtain synthetic and augmented Raman spectra. In this study, we utilized a small experimental dataset of 16 single compound spectra to calibrate quantification models by using partial least squares (PLS) and indirect hard modeling (IHM), leading to comparable rRMSEP values for glucose (4.8% and 4.2%), ethanol (11.6% and 6.3%), and biomass (16.2% and 10.0%) when applied to yeast batch and fed-batch bioprocesses. Subsequently, isolated spectral features extracted during IHM were used to generate fully synthetic spectral datasets for PLS model calibration, resulting in rRMSEPs of 3.2% and 14.5% for glucose and ethanol, respectively. Finally, spectra from a single batch process were augmented with the same isolated spectral features, and calibration with these augmented spectra reduced rRMSEP by 18.6% point (glucose) and 4.3% point (ethanol) compared to process-only calibrated models. This study demonstrates how different approaches may support robust development and rapid implementation of Raman spectroscopy-based models while minimizing experimental efforts, where even complete independence of process data can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.