Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174966›Full record

ArticlePediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2025

Effectiveness of virtual reality in reducing anxiety, fear, and pain in children undergoing skin prick testing: A crossover study.

Rita Nocerino, Adriana Napolitano, Giorgio Bedogni, Teresa Rea, Silvio Simeone, Antonio Masino, Erika Caldaria, Serena Coppola, Laura Carucci, Roberto Berni Canani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effectiveness of virtual reality in reducing anxiety, fear, and pain in children undergoing skin prick testing: A crossover study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rita NocerinoDepartment of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4681-546X
Adriana NapolitanoUniversity of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Giorgio BedogniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1495-9306
Teresa ReaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Silvio SimeoneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonio MasinoDepartment of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Erika CaldariaDepartment of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Serena CoppolaDepartment of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-7904
Laura CarucciDepartment of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Roberto Berni CananiDepartment of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin prick testing (SPT) is a cornerstone diagnostic procedure for identifying allergic sensitizations in children. Despite being minimally invasive, it often provokes considerable anxiety, fear, and pain, potentially compromising test accuracy due to poor compliance. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological tool for procedural distress management, yet its application in allergy diagnostics remains underexplored.

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of VR in reducing procedural anxiety, fear, and pain, and improving compliance in children undergoing SPT.

methodsThis single-center, cross-over interventional study enrolled 108 children (aged 4-18 years) with suspected or confirmed environmental or food allergies. Each participant underwent two SPT sessions: one with immersive VR distraction and one using standard-of-care (SOC) distraction methods, separated by a 6-month washout period. Outcomes were assessed using validated scales for anxiety (Children's Anxiety Meter), fear (Children's Fear Scale), pain (Wong-Baker FACES), and procedural compliance (modified Induction Compliance Checklist). Physiological parameters and staff satisfaction were also recorded.

resultsVR significantly reduced anxiety, fear, and pain compared to SOC across multiple time points, with marked improvements in compliance (100% full compliance in the VR group vs. 0% in SOC) and staff satisfaction. No adverse events were reported, confirming the safety of VR in this setting.

conclusionsVR is a safe and effective tool for minimizing procedural distress and enhancing compliance in children undergoing SPT. Its integration into routine allergy diagnostics may improve patient experience and procedural success.

Indexed as

AnxietyFearHypersensitivityPainSkin TestsVirtual RealityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMalePatient Complianceallergy screening testsanxietychildrencompliancenon‐pharmacological interventionspainskin prick testvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41174966
PMCPMC12579359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.