Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174959›Full record

ArticlePediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2025

Characterizing detectable milk protein allergens β-casein and β-lactoglobulin in milk ladder foods.

Ruth Simmons, Thomas R Vennard, Zafir Gaygadzhiev, Nelson Cano, Michael A Gray, Rosan Meyer, Carina Venter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Characterizing detectable milk protein allergens β-casein and β-lactoglobulin in milk ladder foods.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruth SimmonsMead Johnson Nutrition, R&D, Nutrition Preclinical Research, Slough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9303-639X
Thomas R VennardMead Johnson Nutrition, R&D, Analytical Sciences, Evansville, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-3433
Zafir GaygadzhievMead Johnson Nutrition, R&D, Nutrition Science Platforms, Evansville, Indiana, USA.
Nelson CanoMead Johnson Nutrition, R&D, Nutrition Preclinical Research, Slough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8918-3171
Michael A GrayMead Johnson Nutrition, R&D, Analytical Sciences, Evansville, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8850-1990
Rosan MeyerDept Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-5570
Carina VenterSection of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-5355

Funding

Mead Johnson Nutrition
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCow's milk allergy (CMA) is the most common and complex presentation of food allergies in early childhood. The "ladder" approach has gained popularity to reintroduce cow's milk into a child's diet depending on the type of CMA, though there are very few studies quantifying the level of allergen within the steps of food ladders. This paper aimed to assess detectable levels of milk protein allergens in milk ladder foods.

methodsCookies, muffins, and pancakes were prepared according to the recipes of the International Milk Allergy in Primary (iMAP) care ladder. The effect of the food matrix, heating, and industrial milk processing was assessed by measuring levels of bos d5 (β-lactoglobulin) and bos d11 (β-casein) by ELISA. The other steps of the milk ladder, cheese, yogurt and milk, were also tested and compared.

resultsThe food matrix, baking conditions, and milk processing all influenced the detected levels of bos d5 and bos d11 in the milk ladder foods. The order of the foods by increasing antigen levels depends on the parameter used: calculated levels of total milk protein, detected bos d5, or detected bos d11.

conclusionsThis study shows that the order of milk ladder foods is different depending on whether it is based on calculated protein amounts, measured levels of bos d5 or measured levels of bos d11. HCPs need to be aware that depending on which protein is tested, ladder foods have a different order. This paper provides novel data on detectable proteins bos d5 (β-lactoglobulin) and bos d11 (β-casein) in milk ladder foods, which contribute to our current understanding of milk ladders, critical in the management of CMA.

Indexed as

AllergensCaseinsLactoglobulinsMilkMilk HypersensitivityAnimalsCattleFood HandlingHumansMilk ProteinsAllergensCaseinsLactoglobulinsMilk Proteinscow's milk allergiesfood allergiesfood laddersinternational milk laddermilk allergensmilk laddersmilk proteins

Identifiers

PMID41174959
PMCPMC12579361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.