ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Efficacy of Anlotinib in Treating Progressive Glioblastoma: Insights From a Single-Center Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant tumor in the central nervous system, with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Anlotinib, a novel multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in treating various malignancies. This study systematically analyzed the treatment outcomes of 10 typical patients with progressive GBM in our institution who were treated with anlotinib. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten progressive GBM patients treated with anlotinib between 2020 and 2022 were included. Tumor progression was assessed using modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (mRANO) criteria. Disease progression was evaluated via conventional MRI and physical examinations. Patient condition was measured using the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from anlotinib initiation. Adverse effects were graded using CTCAE 5.0. RESULTS According to the mRANO criteria, 3 patients had a complete response, 3 had a partial response, 1 had stable disease, and 3 had progressive disease, resulting in a 70% disease control rate and a 60% objective response rate. Median PFS was 5.42 months, and median OS was 6.30 months. KPS scores significantly improved after treatment (P<0.05), and QLQ-C30 scores were higher in 11 of 15 items (P<0.05). No grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS Through small-sample real-world research, anlotinib, either as monotherapy or in combination with temozolomide, demonstrated promising therapeutic effects in patients with progressive GBM, suggesting its potential as a targeted treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.