ArticleTrials2025
Lessons learned from two multicentre randomised controlled trials undertaken in pharmacies in community settings: a retrospective project management analysis.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity pharmacists are the most publicly accessible health professionals in high-income countries. There is increasing interest in conducting randomised controlled trials (RCT)-the benchmark of original evidence in the medical field-in community pharmacies. However, little evidence exists examining the challenges and opportunities of conducting RCTs in pharmacies, particularly with respect to project management. In this work, we aim to provide a narrative of lessons learned in conducting two RCTs in community pharmacies in two high-income countries.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed multiple data sources including administrative and trial activity records. We conducted face-to-face and online sessions to create a list of lessons learned from our experiences and created a stakeholder map for the trials examined. We framed our findings using the Project Managements Institute's model of the project life cycle, and descriptive statistics were used to estimate the outcomes reported.
resultsNinety-six pharmacies were recruited. Across the project phases, seven high-level tasks within Initiation; 30 within Planning, 43 within Execution/Monitoring and Controlling, and 14 in Closure, were identified. Recruitment of pharmacies, developing documentation for trial drug supply, participant recruitment, and negotiation with pharmacy contracting bodies took longest to complete. Eight key stakeholder groups were identified, including public services/agencies; community pharmacies, communications actors; funders/sponsors; universities/research institutes; healthcare providers; suppliers; and regulators. Thirty lessons were identified, most critically across engaging and managing stakeholders; selecting and supporting trial sites; streamlining trial processes to minimise burden; optimising data collection and accuracy; and considering pharmacy constraints and costs.
conclusionsConducting RCTs in community pharmacies presents unique challenges across the project life cycle. Key lessons include the importance of early planning, streamlining processes to reduce staff burden, and addressing pharmacy constraints. The complexity of the work necessitates dedicated and well-resourced trial management staff to enhance stakeholder management and offer tailored supports where required.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.