Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174765›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2025

The impact of climate change on mental health in vulnerable groups: a systematic review.

Ridha Mahmood, Philippa Clery, Justin C Yang, Liying Cao, Jennifer Dykxhoorn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ridha MahmoodUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Philippa CleryUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Justin C YangUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Liying CaoUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Jennifer DykxhoornUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. j.dykxhoorn@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute of Health and Care Research, UK University College London Hospital Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change events may disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, exacerbating existing socioeconomic, racial, and cultural inequalities. This systematic review summarises the evidence on the mental health impacts of climate change events on vulnerable populations: (1) low socioeconomic status groups; (2) minoritised ethnic or racial groups; (3) Indigenous groups; and (4) housing-insecure groups.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science for studies published before 17 July 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42023442489). Key search terms included (1) climate change events; (2) mental health; and (3) vulnerable groups. Titles/abstracts and full texts were screened for inclusion, followed by quality assessment and narrative synthesis.

resultsOf the 1,197 articles retrieved, 32 met inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 27) examined acute weather events, with few exploring sub-acute weather events (n = 2), gradual environmental changes (n = 2), or combined events (n = 2). Studies predominantly examined low socioeconomic groups (n = 26) and minoritised ethnic or racial groups (n = 12), with limited research on Indigenous groups (n = 2) or housing-insecure groups (n = 1). The most common mental health outcomes were post-traumatic symptoms/disorder (n = 15), depressive disorder (n = 12), general mental health (n = 8), anxiety disorder (n = 6), and psychological distress (n = 6). 25 of the studies originated from high-income countries, 7 were from middle-income countries, and none from low-income countries. Study quality varied: 7 rated low, 16 medium, and 9 high. Eighteen studies found worse mental health outcomes in vulnerable groups following climate change exposure compared to other populations, five studies found mixed results, and nine found no evidence of worse outcomes in vulnerable groups.

conclusionsVulnerable groups generally experienced worse mental health outcomes following climate change events compared to other populations, though some studies found mixed or null effects. There were critical evidence gaps, including limited high-quality evidence on sub-acute and gradual climate change events, Indigenous or housing-insecure groups, and low-and-middle-income countries. The wide range of mental health outcomes assessed makes direct comparisons challenging. Addressing these gaps is critical to understanding the interplay between existing social inequalities and the mental health impact of climate change, as well as informing effective public health policies in the context of increasing frequency and severity of climate change events globally.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeMental DisordersMental HealthVulnerable PopulationsEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdverse climate eventsClimate changeHealth disparitiesHousing-insecurityIndigenous groupsInequalitiesMental healthMinoritised ethnic or racial groupsSocioeconomic statusSystematic reviewVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID41174765
PMCPMC12577346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.