SynthesisBMC psychology2025
The impact of climate change on mental health in vulnerable groups: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Resilience of adolescents and young adults towards climate-related stressors - a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of climate change on mental health in vulnerable groups: a systematic review.BMC psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence and regional disparities in probable mental health conditions among persons aged 10 years and older in Uganda: Evidence from the 2024 National Population and Housing Census.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Climate-induced vulnerability and health outcomes in urban Bangladesh: the mediating role of psychological stress.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The direct and indirect effects of climate anxiety on psychological distress through hope: A multinational study in different Arab nations.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Culturally-informed strategies to address the differential impacts of climate change-related changing environmental conditions on mental health in regional Australia.The journal of climate change and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClimate change events may disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, exacerbating existing socioeconomic, racial, and cultural inequalities. This systematic review summarises the evidence on the mental health impacts of climate change events on vulnerable populations: (1) low socioeconomic status groups; (2) minoritised ethnic or racial groups; (3) Indigenous groups; and (4) housing-insecure groups.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science for studies published before 17 July 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42023442489). Key search terms included (1) climate change events; (2) mental health; and (3) vulnerable groups. Titles/abstracts and full texts were screened for inclusion, followed by quality assessment and narrative synthesis.
resultsOf the 1,197 articles retrieved, 32 met inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 27) examined acute weather events, with few exploring sub-acute weather events (n = 2), gradual environmental changes (n = 2), or combined events (n = 2). Studies predominantly examined low socioeconomic groups (n = 26) and minoritised ethnic or racial groups (n = 12), with limited research on Indigenous groups (n = 2) or housing-insecure groups (n = 1). The most common mental health outcomes were post-traumatic symptoms/disorder (n = 15), depressive disorder (n = 12), general mental health (n = 8), anxiety disorder (n = 6), and psychological distress (n = 6). 25 of the studies originated from high-income countries, 7 were from middle-income countries, and none from low-income countries. Study quality varied: 7 rated low, 16 medium, and 9 high. Eighteen studies found worse mental health outcomes in vulnerable groups following climate change exposure compared to other populations, five studies found mixed results, and nine found no evidence of worse outcomes in vulnerable groups.
conclusionsVulnerable groups generally experienced worse mental health outcomes following climate change events compared to other populations, though some studies found mixed or null effects. There were critical evidence gaps, including limited high-quality evidence on sub-acute and gradual climate change events, Indigenous or housing-insecure groups, and low-and-middle-income countries. The wide range of mental health outcomes assessed makes direct comparisons challenging. Addressing these gaps is critical to understanding the interplay between existing social inequalities and the mental health impact of climate change, as well as informing effective public health policies in the context of increasing frequency and severity of climate change events globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.