ArticleRespiratory research2025
Antibiotic-driven and microbiota-targeted therapy for advanced management of pulmonary hypertension.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Clinical research on pulmonary hypertension from a 2025 perspective: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary hypertension (PH), particularly secondary to hypoxic lung diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lacks effective targeted therapies. Emerging evidence suggests that microbiota imbalances contribute to PH progression, raising the possibility of microbiome-targeted interventions. This study explores the role of antibiotics in modulating microbiota and ameliorating PH.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database to assess changes in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) after antibiotic treatment. Subsequently, clinical data of 220 PH patients (including group 1, 3, and 4 PH) from single clinical center were analyzed, with 16S rRNA sequencing performed on pharyngeal and fecal samples to evaluate microbiota composition. A hypoxia-induced PH rat model was used to investigate the effects of antibiotic treatment on hemodynamics, pulmonary vascular remodeling, and gut microbiota.
resultsAntibiotic use was associated with reduced mPAP in PH patients, particularly in hypoxic associated PH. Microbiota diversity decreased with antibiotic treatment, but probiotic species like Lactobacillus were enriched. In hypoxia-induced PH rats, antibiotics attenuated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), reduced pulmonary vascular thickening, and preserved gut villi integrity. Lactobacillus and Anaerostipes correlated negatively with PH severity, suggesting a protective role.
conclusionAntibiotic-driven microbiota modulation may alleviate PH progression by targeting dysbiosis and reducing inflammation. These findings support further investigation into optimized antibiotic regimens as a therapeutic strategy for PH, particularly in hypoxic lung disease-associated cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.